Thoughtless for the Day

Friday, September 3rd

Crazed Recluse Leaves Home to Appear in Film


doccup3 (28k image)My friend Doc and I will be filming our part in the upcoming documentary
about legendary Philly band, Ruin tomorrow. This'll mark the first time that Doc and I have worked together on film since the release of Gang-Bang Towel Boy III

I'm sure that no matter how the film turns out, it'll look a lot better than
The History Channel's new show, Decisive Battles. I don't know if
you've seen this show yet, but it's a new hallmark in sad. Here's the
description that the History Channel's web site gives for Decisive
Battles


Using advanced videogame technology, this series offers an unprecedented
perspective of Ancient battles by recreating troops in their vast numbers
and landscapes on a scale otherwise impossible.


I, on the other hand, would describe the show thusly:

Using videogame technology that was out-of-date in 1997, this series offers
views a chance to snicker at really lame re-creations of ancient battles by
depicting one army dressed entirely in green and the opposing army dressed
entirely in red. Bonus comedy points for horses that change direction by
magically "flipping". This has to be seen to be believed.

Don't get me wrong, I love the History Channel (And it's scrappy kid brother,
History International). In fact, I love the history so much, that if
I wake up at 3:00 am, I'll check out the History Channel before I look
for porn. Up until this point the only thing that the History Channel has
done to piss me off is to occasionally treat me like an idiot by sticking the
word Reenactment on the bottom of the screen. What, that's not actual
footage of King John signing the Magna Carte? But Decisive Battles is
unforgivable. Can I get a witness?

Sorry about the short thoughtless. Hopefully, I'll be able to make up for it
by posting throughout the weekend.



Rodney on 09.03.04 @ 10:57 PM EST [link]


Thursday, September 2nd

Where the Hell is Gerald Ford?


ford1 (30k image)The Republic National Convention is almost over and we have yet to hear
from Gerald Ford. What gives?

I shot an email to the good folks at the Gerald Ford Library asking them if
Gerry would be speaking and got the following reply:

Thank you for your recent inquiry. While the Gerald R. Ford Library is
not privy to President Ford's daily schedule, one staff member recalls
President Ford saying on "Larry King Live" that he would not be attending
the Republican National Convention this year. I hope you find this
information helpful. If you need any further assistance, please do not
hesitate to contact me.


Sure he's 91 years old, but he's coherent - or, at least he's as coherent
as he ever was. I'm sure he's healthy enough to stand at the podium for ten
minutes without having a heart attack. I mean, if Dick Cheney can do it,
why not Gerald Ford?

Gerald ford would be the perfect person to introduce George W. Bush. Think
about it. Like George W., Gerry was considered by most people to be a
little slow. Who else knows the pain of hearing an entire room snicker
whenever someone says "re-elect the President." And Both Gerald Ford
and George W. have been threatened with "Some time in Betty Ford."

Most of all, Gerald Ford makes the case for George W. as a uniter, not a
divider. I think that everyone, regardless of political affiliation, can
agree that, next to Dubya, Gerry ford looks pretty good.

Republicans need to step up and recognize Gerry Ford, instead of locking
him away in the attic like some crazy uncle. Wake up, GOP, Reagan's dead.
That leaves you with Bush the elder and Gerry Ford. Since most young people
don't even know that Ford was once President, he's the logical choice to
fill Reagan's shoes.


If the Party of Lincoln wants to remake Ford's image, they need to get
started now. Here are a few tips:

Bring back those WIN (Whip Inflation Now) buttons only, this time, refer to
them as "products of 'Fordonomics'." If some pinko news show airs an old
clip of Ford falling down, respond with "He was a man of the common folk. A
man of the soil. American soil. Teh best soil EVER. And he liked to drop
down upon that soil - a lot." Or just tell 'em to go fuck themselves.

When looking back on the Ford years (both of 'em), be sure to stress what
he didn't do:

Gerald Ford never OKed illegal wiretapping

Gerald Ford never had to kill a rabbit with an oar

Gerald Ford never traded arms for hostages

Gerald Ford never aid "Read my lips, no new taxes"

Gerald Ford never got a blowjob from a chunky intern

Gerald Ford never got a blowjob - period

Gerald Ford never managed to run up the greatest national debt in our
history


Follow these simple steps and Gerald Ford won't be remembered as "That guy
who pardoned Nixon", but as "Our last President from the rustbelt ...ever."

ford3 (144k image)When Gerald Ford finally does cast off his mortal coil, there had gawddamn
better be a whole week's worth of live coverage, like there was for Reagan.
And I wanna see some fat Mid Westerners burst into tears too. In fact,
anybody caught not crying at Ford's funeral should be shipped off to Gitmo
without the benefit of a trial.

Unlike Reagan, there seem to be no Gerald Ford fan sites. On the plus side,
that means that there's no racy Gerald Ford fiction floating around the
web.

If you wanna drop Gerry Ford a line and tell him how much he's missed, you
can write to him here:

Office of Gerald R. Ford
P.O. Box 927
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270


Gerry, had it been our party, you would've been invited.


Rodney on 09.02.04 @ 06:46 PM EST [link]


Wednesday, September 1st

Malkin: NY Times Demands The Death Of All First-Born Males.


m4 (91k image)Remember when you were a little kid and you found your sister's diary? At
first you thought "This is gonna be great. I bet there's all sorts of
really good stuff in here that she'd die of embarrassment if she knew I'd
read". Then you actually read the thing and it was filled with entries like
"May 8: Today at lunch there was applesauce" and "November 10: Some
teachers are nice."

Well that's the way I've come to feel about Michelle "Please Trust My
Yellow Journalism" Malkin's blog. When someone first pointed it out to me I
thought, "Hot damn, this outta be a source of endless, original crazy!"
Now I'm just bored with it, because, although the amount of crazy does seem
endless, it's not very original. Just more of the usual "The Liberals
wanna take away our guns and burn our churches and replace the words 'under
God' with 'all hail Mother Earth' and today at lunch there was applesauce"
crap.

Take, for example, Michelle's column for this week. It's called "The Times'
bias against conservative Christians"
. Yep, it's another one of those
"Christians as victims" pieces right-wing columnists (who are always
whining about groups that "play the victim card".) love to pen every couple
of months or so. In the piece, Malkin gets all in huff because the
editorial staff at the Times seems concerned about the influence of
conservative Christians on our Government.

And why shouldn't they be? The last time I checked this was still a secular
country.
Shouldn't we be concerned about a group that's looking to change
one of the basic tenants of our Government? Especially one that's been
working pretty well for us for over 200 years. I don't know about you
folks, but I like my Government's decisions to be based on logical research
and not the two-thousand-year-old deranged scribbling of some
desert-dwelling whackjob.

Thanks to conservative Christian influence, 30% of the total US foreign aid
budget goes to Israel (Making Israel the largest recipient of US aid in the
world, despite the fact that I've never met a starving Israeli). Why?
Because Israel needs to exist so that Jesus can return. And when he does
return, he'll be the best-armed Deity (In terms of weapons, that is. Kali
has the most actual arms) in history, thanks to the over 200 nuclear
missiles that we've help Israel to acquire.

And can we really trust a God who led his chosen people to the only spot in
the Middle East where there's no oil?

On the domestic front, conservative Christian influence has given us "Faith
Based Initiatives" - federal funding for programs run by any religious
group, as long as they're Christians (No Jewish or Muslim group has ever been
granted any money under the Faith Based Initiative program.).

I'll tell you what, M&M's column this week is so misguided that I'm not
going to waste an entire day's blog on it, OK? Let's just all agreed that
turning America in a Theocracy, like the Taliban did in Afghanistan, is a
genuinely bad idea and that keeping an eye on any group that wishes to do
so is a good idea, and move the fuck on, please.

docfoot (28k image)If the people behind Malkin's weekly column (which, incidentally, is
smaller than my average daily blog, and contains considerably fewer
pictures of my friend, Doc) wanna see some real Democrat-hatin', they
should hire me. Nobody, and I mean nobody, hates the Democrats right now
more than I do.

Why? Because they're taking away my right to choose.

Now, if you tune into the Republic Nation Convention (Being covered,
gavel-to-gavel, live on both The Christian Broadcast Network and the SciFi
channel) you'll see plenty of Democratic protesters (86 blocks away in the
"Free Speech Zone") who'll be happy to tell you that the Republicans want
to take away your right to choose, and they're correct about that. But what
they're not telling you is that the Democrats are taking away some people's
right to choose at this very moment.

On Monday, thanks to some Democratic footwork, a three-judge appellate
panel threw Ralph Nader off the ballot in my home state of Pennsylvania
(teh best state EVER!).

Now, I wasn't planning on voting for Ralph (I'm voting for David Cobb), but
I would've liked to have the option of deciding that for myself. The
Democrats took that choice away from me because it's easier for them to
knock names off the ballot than to actually try to win my vote. You know, I
despise George Bush so much that, at one point, I actually considered
voting for his slightly-less-evil twin, John Kerry, but the recent
statements by Kerry that he would've invaded Iraq even with the knowledge
that there were no WMD's and the recent dirty tricks of the Dems in regards
to getting Nader tossed off ballots, has cost Kerry my vote.

waste (8k image)It's hard enough for a third party candidate to get on the ballot (In PA a
third party candidate needs 25,000 signatures to get on the ballot - Reps
and Dems only need 2,000), once a guy gets there, I say we let him stay.











Rodney on 09.01.04 @ 06:58 PM EST [link]


Tuesday, August 31st

Crazy ain't what it used to be.


Maybe it's a sign that I'm getting old but, the other day when, during the
men's marathon at the Olympics, a man in a skirt ran from the crowd and
tackled one of the runners
, I though to myself "You know, self, they just
don't make crazy people the way they used to." (My second thought was
"Damn, if this sort of thing happened more often, then I might actually
start watching sports").

The heyday of insanity was, of course, the 1970's when Crazy People were at
their creative and cultural peak. Crazy was cutting-edge back then and
crazy people weren't afraid to experiment with new and exciting forms of
insanity like shooting at, or voting for, Gerald Ford.

Shit, Luther, between 1974 and 1982 you couldn't turn on the news without
seeing some mental case reading a list of demands that totally rocked
("Free the Hong Kong 8... Free the Dubai 12... Free the Jackson 5") while
nervous hostages stood around looking nervous and ...um...doing nervous
hostagey things.

arthurk (26k image)To find out more about why the 1970's were such a great era for craziness,
I recently sat down (on a steam vent) with Arthur "The Screamer" Kunkle, a
renowned pioneer in the world of insanity, to discuss the heydays of Crazy.

Rodney Anonymous: You were part of the Crazy movement back in the '70's,
was that an exciting time for you?

Arthur Kunkle: It certainly was. Of course it's always exciting to be part
of new movement, especially when that movement really starts to hit its
stride, but for me, personally, that period was made even more exciting by
the fact that I was being pursued by the Gammamen of Alteris 7 and their
robot henchmen.

RA: What other crazy people were you a fan of, at that time? Who were your
influences?

AK: God, of the secret undersea kingdom, there were so many. Where do I
start? Well, there was "Big Billy" McKean who started that whole "Blacks
are using X-rays to look inside my head" trend. And there was Vic Guillen,
the nun puncher. He was true original. I was also close friends with Tommy
Scott, who killed a lot of midgets, but never really made a name for
himself - I mean other than "The Midget Killer."

RA: What do you think it was about the 70's that allowed Crazy to bloom
from just a few guys sitting outside a feed store complaining about Bigfoot
to a full-blown national obsession, the echoes of which still reverberate
through our culture today?

AK: Sun spots.


So what happened to Crazy? Why aren't Crazy People as fun as they used to
be? Well, as happens with most underground movements, Crazy was absorbed
into the mainstream.


Nowadays, Cult leaders don't engage in mass
suicides anymore, they get crowned in the offices of congress. Religious fanatics are no long exiled to street corners, but welcomed to the White
House. Turn on the news and the odds are pretty good that the guy reading
it off the teleprompter is nuts - and those odds increase dramatically if
you're watching FOX.

If the trend continues we can expect to hear the tagline "I'd cut my balls
off and mail them to the Pope for a Diet Pepsi" before 2010.

In order for Crazy to survive it needs to get back to its roots - taking
nerdy-looking hostages, making unrealistic demands, and "going out on a
blaze of glory", or, failing that, just a blaze. C'mon Crazies, I know you
can do it.

In the words of legendary wave-o band, Red Rider "Lunatic Fringe, I know
you're out there."


Speaking of the fringe, The Philadelphia Fringe Festival begins this
Friday. Those who fail to attend will be killed and their flesh made into
attractive hats, so you'll wanna get your tickets early. I'll be reporting
from the Fringe all next week. Hey, if you go to this show, you get fed.
And the people who did Hatched are back!


Rodney on 08.31.04 @ 05:48 PM EST [link]


Monday, August 30th

I hate Jazz.


nojazz (15k image)The other I was having a beer with my friend Elliot, when he imparted some
truly frightening information (If you have young children at home you may
want to have them leave the room for a minute). Apparently there is a
Professor of Jazz somewhere (I'll presume at a college) who is against
downloading. No, not all downloading. He's just opposed to people
downloading Jazz.

Now, you're probably thinking the obvious at this point (Unless, after 30
years, the Manson Family's plans to dose the nation's water supply with LSD
have finally come to fruition. If that's the case, then you're probably
thinking "Got to get naked so I can taste those car horns"), that Jazz
Professor is against downloading because it takes money out of the pockets
of poor, old Jazz musicians (who, if you want to be a strict
traditionalist, really should only be paid in booze and hookers). No, Jazz
Professor is frothing into his spit valve because, in his learned opinion,
downloading individual songs removes them from their historical context
(Maybe the Manson Family was successful after all).

Allow me to explain - and then weep openly. Jazz Professor (and remember
that this man has a Ph.D.) is convinced that to actually grasp the
complexity of any Jazz tune, one must listen to the entire album that it is
part of. In other words, if you download an individual Jazz song, you just
won't "get it" because the song has been removed from original context.
I'll give you a few minutes to eat an entire bottle of Tylenol before we
continue.

First, I should point out that I have no real problem with a person being a
"Professor of Jazz". Personally, I think that the field should be expanded
to include "Professor of Goth", "Professor of 80's Hair Metal", and
"Professor of Polka". It's always been a dream of mine to attend an
Academic banquet where a Professor of Country and a Professor of Country
And Western come to blows over which one of them is really the
father of Raylene's baby.

That said, what I do have a problem with is Academics who are convinced
that they're preserving an art form. Just as Quantum Physics tells us that
we can't observe an event without changing it, Common Sense should tell us
that the minute you bring just about any art-form into the classroom -
you've killed it. If you think I'm wrong, then I triple-dog-dare you to
attend a pottery class.

A perfect example of this is Appalachian Clog Dancing. Back before 1973
(Officially know as "The Year Everything Started To Suck"), Appalachian
Clog Dancers were exclusively inbred hillbillies whose extraordinary
clogging ability could be chalked up (or "coaled up" as the case may be) to
their extra toes. They had great names like Clem and ...um...Clem Jr. They
worked in mines, or gas stations, or - better yet - didn't work at all and
received a "Gubberment" check.

Then, one day, Academics, deluded by the ideal of the "Noble Savage" and
intent on preserving Appalachian culture, descended on the valleys and
"hollers" like locust. Those who weren't raped and then set ablaze returned
to their Universities as Professors of Appalachian Clog Dancing. And an
industry was born!

Nowadays, if you encounter an Appalachian Clog Dancer, you can rest assured
that that was also their Major. Today's Cloggers have names like Thurston
and Darwin. Oh, sure they still receive checks from the Government, but
these are in the form of Federal Grants. The only place that you'll see
Appalachian Clog Dancing today is in some college's Sociology department.
Meanwhile, back in Appalachian, everybody listens to Hip-hop. Someday, in
the distant future, Academics will feel the need to preserve Appalachian
Hip-hop culture. And so it goes.

Shit, Luther, I also have it on good authority that drawing a turkey by
tracing your hand was once a respected art-form before teachers started
making their students do it.

So you see, Jazz lost its context years ago. And that's not necessarily a
bad thing. After all, Classical music lost its context over a century and a
half ago and people enjoy it without having to wear powdered wigs. Hell,
Punk lost its context the when Green Day's CD went to Number One, but I
fail to remember civilization coming to a screeching halt.

brich (154k image)So, why then, do Jazz purists throw a hissy fit whenever some Rap artist
samples one of Thelonious Gillespie's horn notes without including a 90
volume History of Jazz with the purchase of their CD so that
listeners may place the note in its proper musical context? Well, and you
may be shocked to learn this, there are a lot of Jazz experts out there who
don't actually like Jazz. We can blame society for this.

Around the same time when those College Professors descended on Appalachia,
society started telling people that they needed to appreciate Jazz.
Historians are still divided as to rather this was a by-product of Liberal
White-Guilt or an insidious plot by the KKK to stomp out Black music by
taking the fun out of it. Either way, Jazz became something that you're
supposed to like. Which is probably why I hate it.

There, I said it. I hate Jazz. For a musician to admit to hating Jazz is
tantamount to a Baptist minister admitting that he likes to sneak off every
now and then to a Cradle of Filth concert...with his Gay buddies.

Please keep in mind it's not so much the actual music that I hate, and it's
certainly not the musicians (Except for Kenny G. because he sucks and Miles
Davis because he was an asshole). No, the reason I hate jazz is because the
people who tried to preserve it changed its context from something that was
to be enjoyed to something that was to be appreciated.

Music, like art, literature and the Aqua Teen Hunger Force are meant to be
enjoyed. Not studied until they're no longer fun. And that's why, if I ever
meet a Professor of Ramonesology, I'll slap him so hard that he'll get
picked up for speeding in Trenton.


Rodney on 08.30.04 @ 06:27 PM EST [link]




divide2 (4k image)

Home
Archives
Ronald Reagan in Hell
RATYHTL Store
The Paul Kircher Show
The Dead Milkmen

September 2004
SMTWTFS
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  



Powered By Greymatter

cobb (33k image)