A Day at the Races
Had you asked me, two weeks ago, if there was a racial component to IQ, I would've answered with an emphatic "Hell no!" After all (and I know that you can't base a theory about an entire group on the actions of a few erratic individuals) isn't Derek Pitts Black while is Lisa "Blair" Whelchel is White?...really, really White.
The problem is that I've always said the difference between Liberals and Conservatives is that Liberals look at all the evidence before forming their opinions, while Conservatives burn books and molest puppies. So, let's take a look at the evidence. We'll start with argument for Race having an impact on IQ:
Now we'll look at the other evidence for Race having an impact on IQ (please note that I'll be leaning heavily - some might say plagiarizing - on a series of pieces written for Slate by William Saletan). Let's go to the scoreboard:
In first place among ethnic groups residing in the US we have the Jews with an average IQ of 113. Congratulations on your victory, Jews. Let's just hope the awards ceremony isn't in Alabama.
In second place it's the Asians, chalking up an average IQ of 106. Not the top of the heap, but still clever enough to play joke by putting pee-pee in your coke.
Whites (aka "The Man", "Honkies", and "Mr. Charlie") clock in with an average IQ of 103. An impressive showing when you consider that there are plenty of stupid fuckin' White people out there.
Latinos take fourth place with a not-so-caliente average score of 89, while Blacks find themselves in the back of the IQ bus, with an average score of 85.
Now, you might be tempted to say "Well, sure, this might hold true for the United States with its evil history of Racism and building big cars with fins, but about the rest of the world?"
Bad news (for everybody except Jews and Asians, that is). First of all, remember that Whites are not at the top of the list (as would be expected if a cultural bias were at work). Secondly, when global studies are looked at, the numbers seem to hold up: Asians at about 106, Whites at roughly 100, and sub-Sarahan Africans pulling about 70.
Now, before you get all worked up, just take a deep breath and remind yourself that Michelle Malkin is and Asian, Ben Stein is a Jew, and they're both dumber than a box of rocks. And Malkin is a slut.
Next time we'll take a look at what might be causing the difference in the numbers.
Comments
Accepting the numbers and methodology as accurate, I still would caution drawing too many conclusions from this. What IQ scores measure are how well you do on IQ tests. There may very well be some racial component here, but I would not generalize that to something as complex as intelligence. As I've said before, I scored 164 on my last test. Anyone who knows me will verify, I'm closer to Ben Stein than Einstein.
Posted by: razlerja
|
November 28, 2007 10:02 AM
I agree with raz. Let me point out also that how well someone does on a test has a lot to do with whether primary needs of food, shelter, and water are being met. Maybe the people in sub-Saharan Africa didn't do so well because their basic physical needs aren't being met. Just for kicks, how about we send all the Jews and Asians over to Africa for three generations and have all the Africans come here? Then retest and see how everyone scores.
Posted by: Firefly
|
November 28, 2007 11:54 AM
"Jon Frum will bring about a new age of peace and health, and will usher in much desired cargo like trucks, refrigerators and guitars."
That's the kind of religious heritage I can get behind. More Guitars!
Posted by: Circu$Banjoz
|
November 28, 2007 02:57 PM
Don't make me have to use the F-word, you gawddamn Race-traitors! I think I made it abundantly clear that you can NOT determine an individual's intelligence based simply on his or her Race.
What I'm saying is that that you can't deny the difference in average IQ scores by Race, and that I'm interested in understanding why those differences exist. For all I know, people in sub-Saharan Africa don't have access to No. 2 lead pencils, which are needed to properly fill out the test.
Hehe..."No. 2"
Posted by: Rodney Anonymous
|
November 28, 2007 05:59 PM
Correlation does not necessarily imply causation. I would imagine that there is a socio-economic aspect here that is being ignored.
Posted by: Brian
|
November 29, 2007 11:26 AM
you all make good points but you are over looking the fact that black people for the most part recieve less education than jews ,whites and asians. I do believe if there is a racial component to IQ,then the whites make up for thier lack of athletics by being smarter. This also helps explain penis size. Blacks having larger penises because for centuries they may have used them to attract mates and jews and asians may have relied on forced marraige? Oh and what physical features do aliens supposeldy have? Large head almond eyes,right? if in fact asians are more advanced, aliens may be the next stage in our cycle of evolution? just throwin that out there.
Posted by: norseman
|
November 29, 2007 04:03 PM
haha, i was wondering how long it'd take for someone to get insecure enough to bring up the dick size myth. good to know that some things on the internet are never gonna change.
Posted by: dogfaceboy
|
November 30, 2007 09:01 AM
shuh-up, yall' don't know me!!
Posted by: norseman
|
November 30, 2007 05:46 PM
This next installment in this thrilling series should be up before tomorrow night. Sorry, I've been swamped. I suppose a Jew or an Asian would've been finished by now.
Posted by: Rodney Anonymous
|
November 30, 2007 06:29 PM
This is interesting:
"Other examples of IQ increase through early enrichment projects can be found in Israel, where children with a European Jewish heritage have an average IQ of 105 while those with a Middle Eastern Jewish heritage have an average IQ of only 85. Yet when raised on a kibbutz, children from both groups have an average IQ of 115."
Source: http://iq-test.learninginfo.org/iq03.htm
I'm not quite sure what to think about any of this. Being a regular 'ol white guy, it isn't fun to hear about an inherent genetic predisposition to mediocrity. Nobody wants the sense of futility of being unable to grow and change. Perhaps the seemingly ubiquitous sentiment that "blacks are dumb" is making black folks underperform/lose motivation? Stereotypes are a strong beast. I don't know, I'm not researcher
Posted by: Direlect
|
November 30, 2007 11:43 PM
Also, what are the implications for IQ, anyway? Can we deduce from the number not only how fast someone can learn something, but what specific material he/she could learn? That's to say, are IQ scores telling of an invisible glass-ceiling, that filters out those that can learn something like Differential Calculus, and those that can't? If so, shouldn't there be an IQ number that tells us who can play certain music, understanding certain books, draw certain connections or whatever else inherently. A sort of "You Must be this IQ to be in The Dead Milkmen" sign.
Posted by: Direlect
|
December 1, 2007 12:28 AM
IQ tests dont exactly tell you how smart you are,just how many trivial things you know! For example a person in Cambodia may be more street smart than an American Harvard graduate. Although the American is "smarter" if you place him in Cambodia he would probably be fucked. Now if you placed the Cambodian in New york he would probably make something of himself! Honestly "IQ" is just a result of your environment......and dogface your an asshole.
Posted by: norseman
|
December 1, 2007 11:42 AM
dude, calm down. i'm sorry about the size of your dick and all, but don't go blaming it on black people, is all i'm saying.
Posted by: dogfaceboy
|
December 2, 2007 09:09 AM
im not blaming anyone for anything lol. and just because my name is "norseman" doesnt mean Im white. I really dont know why you have to pick on me for bringing up a valid point? You dont have to agree with what i said, hell i dont really agree with what i said but its just a theory thats all. Even Darwin didnt fully believe in the theory of evolution but there was scientific evidence to give it credit. Dont assault me because you have the face of a dog...
Posted by: norseman
|
December 2, 2007 10:34 AM
man, i never said you were white. i just pointed out that the race vs dick size thing is a fallacy. a phallusy fallacy, you might say. i just assumed that anyone who takes it seriously must have some kind of, um, "personal" reason for doing so. or possibly just watches too much internet porn. either way, it's pretty funny.
Posted by: dogfaceboy
|
December 2, 2007 12:04 PM
i cant believe we are still arguing over the internet! Thats silly. And whats also silly is the fact that you thought i took this subject matter seriously. You=too damned cute. I never said i belived in it(i dont by the way, but you have to admit my theory does make sense). How do you know its a myth anyways? You must have seen quite a few penises to discredit such a thing! Thats cool I mean we're all liberals here.
Posted by: norseman
|
December 3, 2007 06:53 PM